Anti-fungal and bio-control properties of chitinolytic bacteria against safflower Fusarium root rot

10.48311/jcp.2017.1350
Volume 6, Issue 2
June 2017
Pages 225-234

Authors

1 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Department of Horticultural Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract
A total of 78 rhizobacterial strains were isolated from 48 rhizospheric soil and root samples, collected from safflower Carthamus tinctorius L. fields located in different regions of Iran. The chitinolytic activity was measured in the presence of colloidal chitin as the sole carbon source. Eleven isolates were identified as chitinolytic bacteria, based on the formation of a clearly visible zone on the growth media. Four isolates including EM9, ES41, ES7 and ER13 exhibited the highest chitin degradation activity based on a clear zone diameter of more than 10 mm. According to a ribotyping analysis, EM9, ES41, and ES7 isolates were identified as Bacillus cereus and ER13 was found to be Pantoea agglomerans. In a dual-culture assay, morphogenic changes such as severely collapsed hyphae, decreased hyphal diameter with condensation and granulation of cytoplasm and highly rolled with formation of big clamydoconida in anomalous sporodochia -like structures were also observed using light microscope. Under greenhouse conditions, the application of selected chitinolytic isolates, i.e., EM9, ES41, ES7 and ER13, on safflower seeds significantly reduced seedling damping-off caused by Fusarium solani. In addition, the results revealed that root and shoot dry weight in infected plants that were treated with EM9 isolate suspension, increased by 14 and 22%, respectively.

Keywords

Ahmed, E. A., Hassan, E. A., El-Tobgy, K. M. K. and Ramadan, E. M. 2014. Evaluation of rhizobacteria of some medicinal plants for plant growth promotion and biological control. Annals of Agricultural Science, 59: 273-280.
Ajit, N. S., Verma, R. and Shanmugam, V. 2006. Extracellular chitinase of fluorescent pseudomonads antifungal to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. dianthi causing carnation wilt. Current Microbiology, 52: 310-316.
Akocaka, P. B., Churey, J. J. and Worobo, R. W. 2015. Antagonistic effect of chitinolytic Pseudomonas and Bacillus on growth of fungal hyphae and spores of aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus. Food Bioscience, 10: 48-58.
Bell, A., Hubbard, J. C., Liu, L., Davis, R. M. and Subbarao, K. V. 1998. Effects of chitin and chitosan on the incidence and severity of Fusarium yellows of celery. Plant Diseases, 82: 322-328.
Bergey, D. H. and Holt, J. G. 2000. Bergy’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 9th edn, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Chang, W. T., Chen, C. S. and Wang, S. L. 2003. An antifungal chitinase produced by Bacillus cereus with shrimp and crab shell powder as a carbon source. Current Microbiology, 47: 102-108.
Chet, I., Ordentlich, A., Shapira, R. and Oppenheim, A. 1990. Mechanism of biocontrol of soil-borne plant pathogens by rhizobacteria. Plant Soil, 129: 85-92.
Compant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clement, C. and Barka, E. A. 2005. Use of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria for Biocontrol of Plant Diseases: Principles, Mechanisms of Action, and Future Prospects. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 71: 4951-4959.
Ghanbarzadeh, B., Safaie, N., Mohammadi-Goltapeh, E., Danesh Y. R. and Khelghatibana, F. 2016. Biological control of Fusarium basal rot of onion using Trichoderma harzianum and Glomus mosseae. Journal of Crop Protection, 5(3): 359-368.
Hariprasad, P., Divakara, S. T. and Niranjana, S. R. 2011. Isolation and characterization of chitinolytic rhizobacteria for the management of Fusarium wilt in tomato. Crop Protection, 30: 1606-1612.
Huang, C. J., Wang, T. K., Chung, S. C. and Chen, C. Y. 2005. Identification of an Antifungal Chitinase from a Potential Biocontrol Agent, Bacillus cereus 28-9. Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 38: 82-88.
Idris, H. A., Labuschagne, N. and Korsten, L. 2007. Screening rhizobacteria for biological control of fusarium root and crown rot of sorghum in Ethiopia. Biological Control, 40: 97-106.
Kamil, Z., Rizk, M., Saleh, M. and Moustafa, S. 2007. Isolation and identification of rhizosphere bacteria and their potential in antifungal biocontrol. Global Journal of Molecular Science, 2: 57-66.
Karthik, N., Binod, P. and Pandey, A. 2015. Purification and characterisation of an acidic and antifungal chitinase produced by a Streptomyces sp. Bioresource Technology, 188: 195-201.
Mahmoudi, E., Hassanzadeh, N., Sayed-Tabatabaei, B. E. and Venturi, V. 2011. Virulence attenuation of Pectobacterium carotovorum using N-acyl-homoserine lactone degrading bacteria isolated from potato rhizosphere. Plant Pathology Journal, 27: 242-248.
Orlandelli, R. C., Almeida, T. T., Alberto, R. N., Polonio, J. C., Azevedo, J. L. and Pamphile, J. A. 2015. Antifungal and proteolytic activities of endophytic fungi isolated from Piper hispidum Sw. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 46: 359-366.
Sharifnabi, B. and Saeidi, G. 2004. Preliminary evaluation of different genotypes of safflower to Fusarium root rot disease. Journal of Science Technology and Agriculture Natural Resource, 8: 227-234.
Suryanto, D., Indarwan, A. and Munir, E. 2012. Examination of chitinolytic bacteria in Aliginate chitosan encapsulation on chili seed against damping off caused by Fusarium oxysporum. Am. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 7: 461-467.
Vasebi, Y., Alizadeh, A. and Safaie, N. 2015. Pantoea agglomerans ENA1 as a biocontrol agent of Macrophomia phaseolina and growth enhancer of soybean. Journal of Crop Protection, 4 (1): 43-57.
Wang, S. L., Lin, T. Y., Yen, Y. H., Liao, H. F. and Chen, Y. J. 2006. Bioconversion of shellfish chitin wastes for the production of Bacillus subtilis W-118 chitinase. Carbohydrates Research, 341: 2507-2515.
Zhang, Z. and Yuen, G. Y. 2000. The role of chitinase production by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain C3 in biological control of Bipolaris sorokiniana. Phytopathology, 90: 384-389.